Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Rambo IV

i just finished watching Rambo IV, another sequel of John Rambo. my personal right on the first place about the movie is.. he was just trying to come back, i guess :p

anyway, the movie is much less no different than the previous three (the first one is the best, still!),
but here i notice some variance:

‘more’ bloods shed all over the war-land
when i said ‘more’, that means – instead of ‘too much’ – it was too wasteful of blood. well, yes, for example, he cut his enemy’s belly thoroughly.. *hihi* or he head-shot the bad guy , somehow i amazed, so that you will see a head blasted from its neck.. or when the bullets splashed out all around the enemy, it just like you throw an orange on the floor *pyarrr.. crrrrrrtttt* haha..

somehow it just like ‘different’ plot
what was it? the problem arose when a group of messenger ask rambo to help them go across a river to assist a war-village in burma. as a well-experienced soldier, he just could not help stay on the boat when the missionarries were held as prisoners, and might be executed soon.
then the action began..
---------------------------------------------

it was a straight forward movie-plot. you could guess easily who’s gonna be the winner and the loser.
however, i was quite surprised that somewhat some of the good people was executed. the action-tensed itself was impressive..

just wanna append one crucial thought which came across my mind.
the missionaries are to disagree on taking someone else’s life, i guess..
but, what if.. it is carried out,
in order to survive.. ? or..
with the intention of saving other’s life.. ? or..
to prevent more crucial damage.. ?

is it acceptable?
=================================================================================

0 comments:

Post a Comment

 

Distributed by eBlog Templates